Anunnaki Pantheon – Ancient Mythology World Religions & Supremacy Rights

[nabu]

posted from the Mardukite NecroGate.

“Although the natural succession rules would have passed the leading role of the “younger pantheon” to NINURTA, the heir of ENLIL, it is MARDUK, the heir of ENKI that takes the command and establishes himself as the “King of the Gods” in Babylon, and then as RA in Egypt. This aspect was reflected in the mystical and traditional literature in Babylon, of which the most popular renditions of the Mesopotamian tablets have been based – for example the Enuma Elis or “Epic of Creation,” which was forged in Babylon by the Nabu Priests to give the magicians proof that MARDUK was “Lord of Lords.” [The Mardukite transliterations of these tablets can be found in the Necronomicon Anunnaki Bible as the N and F-Series.]“

“The harmony of Sumer was lost to philosophical debating and political agendas, leaving the world, from then on, split between allegedly “Enlilite” and “Mardukite” traditions – heralding thousands of years of fighting and destruction in the name of gods who actually weep for the horrifying naiveté of their children. But the gods have seemed lost, distant and forgetful to men – and men have removed themselves with each generation farther and farther from their origins.”

The urge to know is there. The answers are there. It is time for you to step through the portal. And rise to your full potential with the research of the Mardukite Chamberlains. This post is an official excerpt of “Anunnaki – An Introduction” produced by the Mardukite Truth Seeker Press. Explore the wide world of the Chamberlains through the NecroGate.

[hybride]

I would like to point out that it's rather amusing to see how this so-called war between Enlil and Enki actually became a war between Enlil and Marduk.

Am sure there was some aggravation between Enlil/Enki at first (supposedly being jipped, but I don't see how as it was agreed to draw lots), but was this war even necessary? Or is Enki using Marduk as a scapegoat, fueling his own anger through Marduk to try and get back at Enlil?

[nabu]

Although our Mardukite "Gates of the Necronomicon" material talks about the rising politics among the younger generation - its hard to be certain that the hostility between Supernals is genuine, or only felt from the perception of humans.

[Frater Apotheosis]

Well, looks like we found the origin of the "my god has a bigger dick than your god" political argument that always ends in warfare. It's hard to believe it's gone on for this long.

[nabu]

There's still some element of "chicken vs. egg" in place. The changing perceptions of the population toward divinity goes hand-in-hand with the tablet materials and traditions being relayed - which in essence is always in control of the "rulers of the realm" - those who are in control of the "light" of the people; we can hesitantly debate about whether or not the politics began with the "gods" themselves or was really in place by the people alone. As the drawing of "lots" and division of the "celestial sphere" (zodiac) and stations of the governors had always been in place - the peculiarity of what takes place several thousand years ago surrounds the Aryan age and the denial of supremacy to Marduk. As a result the post-Sumerian (Babylonian) worldview and heavenview was adopted and the world continued to be divided (a metaphoric "Tower of Babel").

[sethbobfarms]

(06-22-2010 06:29 AM)nabu Wrote:  Although our Mardukite "Gates of the Necronomicon" material talks about the rising politics among the younger generation - its hard to be certain that the hostility between Supernals is genuine, or only felt from the perception of humans.

Could it be that the hostilities between the Supernals was genuine in light of the sexual conquests of Enlil and Enki. both highly sexed and aggressive. Remember "Airborne Ranger Sex and Danger" These are very instinctual drives hardwired into sentient bipedal entities. Poor Enlil even had to pay a political price for one of his amorous exploits with the female in the sail boat. I ain't mad at him, I would have got me some too. That was some "Pimpen shit" he should have been given a medal. Patton said it best; "If a soldier won't fuck then he won't fight...." So chances are it was genuine.

[sethbobfarms]

(06-23-2010 06:54 AM)nabu Wrote:  There's still some element of "chicken vs. egg" in place. The changing perceptions of the population toward divinity goes hand-in-hand with the tablet materials and traditions being relayed - which in essence is always in control of the "rulers of the realm" - those who are in control of the "light" of the people; we can hesitantly debate about whether or not the politics began with the "gods" themselves or was really in place by the people alone. As the drawing of "lots" and division of the "celestial sphere" (zodiac) and stations of the governors had always been in place - the peculiarity of what takes place several thousand years ago surrounds the Aryan age and the denial of supremacy to Marduk. As a result the post-Sumerian (Babylonian) worldview and heavenview was adopted and the world continued to be divided (a metaphoric "Tower of Babel").

Granted that the rulers hold sway over the tablet materials and traditions being relayed; but it seems that the politics began with the gods themselves; in light of the story of Anu himself having to engage, a rival, in mortal combat for Lordship of the Annuna.
If we superimpose a linear time line on the story of Anu's ascendency to the throne this happened way before the saga of Marduk.

Wouldn't this suggest political rivalries where an inherent part of Annuna civilization.
Civilization and war within a human context has always gone hand in hand. Civilization itself and all that is inherent in it is a patriarchal artificial construct when contrasted against natural systems where the matriarch is the primary sustainer and progenitor of the group; like in bee/ant colonies or lion prides and family law court:.
In light of the intrinsic aspects of the patriarchs role in civilization the pre and post Sumerian (Babylonian) paradignm couldn't be anything but an extension of the custodial race's politics.

[hybride]

(08-13-2010 04:20 PM)sethbobfarms Wrote:  Wouldn't this suggest political rivalries where an inherent part of Annuna civilization.

Yes, it would, as with all civilizations - human or not.

Quote:Civilization itself and all that is inherent in it is a patriarchal artificial construct when contrasted against natural systems where the matriarch is the primary sustainer and progenitor of the group; like in bee/ant colonies or lion prides and family law court:.

I do believe it has something to do with the human male's inability to cope with not having a penis on the outside (as the vagina is simply an inverted penis).

Or too much testosterone. (Maybe neutering is the way to go?)

(08-13-2010 03:42 PM)sethbobfarms Wrote:  Poor Enlil even had to pay a political price for one of his amorous exploits with the female in the sail boat. I ain't mad at him, I would have got me some too.

That situation never happened - that would be the LATER version, a political agenda to sabotage and deface him (and concurrently, Ninlil).

The original version was entitled "Enlil and Sud," where there was no rape involved (or violence or anything). However, it is a very heart-warming and amusing story, as you don't see Enlil getting his foot in his mouth very often!

Going back to the so-called "rape" version, if you were to even read it, there was no rape anyway. Ninlil was told by her mother to "show herself off" (basically, to charm) to Enlil in order to charm him and become his bride.

Because clearly a rape victim goes to follow the man that raped her to have sex with 3 other men, flaunting that she had sex with Enlil.

That really makes sense.