Anunnaki Gods, Demigods, Human Ancestry, Alien DNA … oh my!

[nabu]

posted from the Mardukite NecroGate.

“Outside of, what can be most correctly defined as “Mardukite” traditions of Babylon and Egypt, the arm of the system known by the “Enlilite” lineages, is what is reflective most strongly in the Semitic Judeo-Christian lore that is perhaps the most famous. Here, the Anunnaki have now become the “Anakim” or “angels,” with their leader being heralded as “Lord God.” Although deeply influenced by the earlier Sumerian and Babylonian records, the vision of the Anunnaki gods as they truly are became hidden in the backwaters of later philosophical doctrines and religious monotheism.”

“The older ideas that this were based on tell the story in a different context – In the beginning, these beings seeded themselves here as “deities” or “figureheads,” each one being essentially the leading patron deity of a particular city in the Middle East, graced by a large stepped-pyramid, called a “ziggurat,” where that being called home during their stay on earth. As a deity, each one later was interpreted as a “god,” something completely misunderstood in relation to most contemporary outlooks on divinity and monotheism.”

This post contains official excerpts form the introductory booklet produced by the Mardukite Truth Seeker Press. Discover the wide world of the Chamberlains Research at NecroGate.com.

[Emely]

Hi yeah I'm sorry I know you must've told me a million times but - where do the pleiadians fit?
While I was doing my research on the Elven Faerie and such in other countries this whole thing just led me to the pleiadians? What does that mean? I don't understand..
Their descriptions are similar with almost all of the stuff I have found as being deities among atleast 4 different countries. In the subject of the pleiadians they were also viewed as 'gods' and what perhaps started religion gone wrong. Maybe this reply is in the wrong thread but Idk where else to put this?

[nabu]

(07-02-2010 02:10 PM)Emely Wrote:  where do the pleiadians fit?

You are talking about the portion of the cosmos from an earthly vantage point that includes the beloved Sirius. My work with the Anunnaki and the occult/mystic lore surrounding this I am hoping to unveil in "Liber R" - though I can safely say at this juncture that the Anunnaki Elder Gods are from the Sirius/Pleiades area, while their ancestral line (at least for Enki and Marduk) come from the primordial "Ancient Ones" "of the North" - indicating the Bear/Dragon current.

(07-02-2010 02:10 PM)Emely Wrote:  While I was doing my research on the Elven Faerie and such in other countries this whole thing just led me to the pleiadians? What does that mean? I don't understand...

It means there is a unifying source behind the "designers" of the material world. Not so much in terms of "Creation" - but the ability to affect the "program" that is run in "systems" (again a concept I want to delve more deeply in further work...)

(07-02-2010 02:10 PM)Emely Wrote:  In the subject of the pleiadians they were also viewed as 'gods' and what perhaps started religion gone wrong.

oh boy... do I excerpt from "Liber R" even though its not finished? *sigh*

"There are actually many beings and consciousness creature fragments in existence, but it was a specific group (called generically “Anunnaki,” which simply refers to “those who came to earth from the sky”) that seemed to be responsible for the installation of the current programs in place – which once Babylonian politics entered the fray, and perhaps even before this, the “lots” drawn for the heirarchy of the local universe, the “younger generation” of “Elder Gods” and their ancestors or “Ancient Ones” all failed on this. The responsibility toward operation of these installed programs, which were handed off to specific lineages and cultures for caretaking, also all failed – miserably." (Joshua Free, Liber R)

"This last age of approximately 2,000 years actually started on a simple and beautiful premise from a wise messenger from the gods – but men misunderstood gravely and failed to accept this new programming and decided to continue fucking the program up to the extent of even invoking the name of this peaceful messenger as a guise in corrupting it. Skeptics and occultists alike wonder why the Anunnaki gods do not materialize in the world as they once did – but look what this world would do to them? Do you think Enlil, Enki or Marduk wants to be nailed to a tree for your ignorance? Hardly." (Joshua Free, Liber R)

(07-02-2010 02:10 PM)Emely Wrote:  Maybe this reply is in the wrong thread but Idk where else to put this?

eh. dont worry about that.

[hybride]

You have to love a book that swears in it.

[tigi]

– In the beginning, these beings seeded themselves here as “deities” or “figureheads,” each one being essentially the leading patron deity of a particular city in the Middle East, graced by a large stepped-pyramid, called a “ziggurat,” where that being called home during their stay on earth.


Hi I only stumbled upon this whole Mardukite thing a week or so ago so am feeling somewhat overwhelmed with the volume of information here and at odds as where to start. But I am intrigued about the idea if the ziggurat being used to 'call home'. Some years ago I went to Egypt and had some seriously weird experiences which triggered a whole series of 'memories?' one of which was about being part of a communication process that was with beings that were definitely off world. I was an intensely real experience set in a chamber not unlike those I saw in the pyramids. Are you saying that they used the ziggurat to phone home? and if so how?
Tigi

[nabu]

(07-21-2010 09:52 PM)tigi Wrote:  Are you saying that they used the ziggurat to phone home? and if so how?

Well - what I wrote was that they used them as homes while on earth - as to the semantics for "how" they themselves communicated with another world - that is not within the scope of the work or suggested.

With all their little cellular devices and social networks, humans haven't figured out how to even communicate proper with each other, then alone the gods, then alone concerning with the "hows" of the gods - which is really more of an "intellectual delight" that isn't necessarily going to advance people any further.

The gods don't want everyone and anyone ringing them off the hook (incessant pleads and gimme phone calls) and people struggle enough on their own just understanding and beholding divinity.

[tigi]

Thankyou for your reply, though I'm not really seeking a way of directly contacting th gods, I'm cirtainly not seeking to replicate my experience which was a disturbing and upleasant one. What I'm really seeking is some context that might give me some understanding of it. Reading those particular words bought the whole thing flooding back to me quite vividly and although I have clearly misunderstood your words it appears there is something in me that still seeks an answer. Thanks for the prod guess I'll have to look further afield.

[nabu]

(07-23-2010 12:04 PM)tigi Wrote:  not seeking to replicate my experience which was a disturbing and upleasant one. What I'm really seeking is some context that might give me some understanding of it.

Understand that all experience is subjective to the psyche based on its fixed parameters, definitions and logs of previous experience. Without true-knowledge an experience defined as "mystical", "spiritual" or "supernatural" can seem very much scary and disturbing - this happens when the mind encounters something it doesn't already have a file for. When it does it becomes transfigured toward that - e.g. Christians equate similar phenomenon by their semantics like "Marion apparitions".

[lil gremlin]

(07-23-2010 12:04 PM)tigi Wrote:  I'm not really seeking a way of directly contacting the gods

then might i ask what you are seeking?

[hybride]

(07-23-2010 12:04 PM)tigi Wrote:  Thankyou for your reply, though I'm not really seeking a way of directly contacting th gods, I'm cirtainly not seeking to replicate my experience which was a disturbing and upleasant one. What I'm really seeking is some context that might give me some understanding of it. Reading those particular words bought the whole thing flooding back to me quite vividly and although I have clearly misunderstood your words it appears there is something in me that still seeks an answer. Thanks for the prod guess I'll have to look further afield.

Without seeking how to replicate it, you can't understand the entire scope of what the context was - be it good or bad.