Liber 51 | Alien Anunnaki Dragon Bloodline, Divine Right of Kingship from Heaven

[nabu]

An excerpt concerning Divine Right to Rule, Egypto-Babylonian King Lists, The Descent of Kingship from Heaven and Alien Anunnaki Dragon Bloodlines from the 2011 release from the Mardukite Truth Seeker Press: Babylonian Myth & Magic – In History & Practice by Joshua Free.

Quote:An examination of the Sumerian and Babylonian King-Lists will reveal the belief that “kingship” was “sent down” from “heaven” as decreed by the gods. To this we might add that a similar tradition has been followed by many indigenous ancient cultures. These dynastic lists originate by Sumerian hands, but they were later re-catalogued in Babylon by Nabu Priest-Scribes. Similar King-Lists have also been found in Egypt and they all suggest some very amazing notions for the contemporary mind to grasp.

The chronology of the King-Lists are separated by a critical event, one which is found within the cosmological records of all ancient cultures – the Deluge or Great Flood. This means that Sumerian civilization began in antediluvian times, prior to the Deluge. This controversial event consisted of both torrential storms and the rise of ground floor water in connection to the melting glaciers and ice at the end of the Pleistocene period. The King-Lists appear congruent with this time scale also, but the shifting sands of Mesopotamia provide few clues for us since the ancient sites were often dismantled or found in ruins and later built over by cultural successors. What this signifies is that the pre-Babylonian, pre-Sumerian Ubaid periods are not the true absolute origins for “prehistoric” civilization, but instead the origins for the efforts that were resumed after the earth was stable for societal habitation again, following the last Ice Age.

Mystical texts speak of a “primordial sea” or “Abyss” that first swept over the earth (or in the universe) prior to the separation and manifestation of individual ‘forms’ in existence. Although it might be easy for a mythographer to simply attribute this archetypal image to a Deluge, all of the ancient records are in agreement that this was not the first cause, that something came before it, disagreeing only on a timeline and details. Even the Judeo-Christian texts support the idea that the Deluge took place after the creation of humans. But, further research will reveal that the entire Semitic scriptural basis for the Deluge and Creationism can be found practically verbatim on cuneiform tablets derived from thousands of years of tradition before the Semitic culture even existed unto itself. So, when asked – “Is it that the cuneiform tablets support the belief in biblical history or is the Holy Bible what lends credibility to the writings of greater antiquity?” – there is no ‘good’ answer because the question itself is at fault. There is, however, yet another significant similarity to address that would appear to unite the biblical beliefs with those of the more ancient cultures – returning us to our present topic on kingship.

Sumerian and Egyptian records are very clear about the nature of the being occupying the seat of kingship at its start – gods. The original overseers were considered divine, having come from the stars/sky and bringing with them the knowledge and technologies that would cultivate humanity. The reign of these divine beings was eventually replaced by hybrid demigods (part-Divine; part-human) until finally being passed to the control of a specialized segment of mankind. At each stage of development, the concept of dynastic succession remains paramount – the idea that the “divine blood” flows from the heart of the ‘true’ kings in the line, which in turn can be passed on to their offspring. The tradition of Divine Right to Rule is as ancient as human society altogether and may even have origins beyond only this planet.

The origins of the word “ruler,” “regent” and “realm” all reflect the absolute “god-like” nature of the original king, especially after the unification of the two lands of Babylonia, where one man – one lugal – was elevated to the position of a blessed and lofty demigod. More than simply a title of power, this role required the person to be an active intermediary between the people and the gods and thus acted as a kind of priest-king. What’s more, the interconnectedness of the “realm” was inseparable from this king. The king and his land are one. The king and his people are one. The fate of one proved to reflect the other throughout history many times over and the people couldn’t deny it – a good and just king resulted in expansion and fruitful land, whereas the rule of unjust ungodly tyrants weakened the integrity of the Babylonian Empire every time.

Properly guided kings realized they were essentially Divine Representation on earth and with this came great responsibility. In fact, the freedoms, responsibilities and penalties of the population all rose relative with class – quite different even, than what we see often today. The ‘true’ kings understood that they existed for the people, representatives of the gods on earth, exercising the same divine power that had been executed by the gods themselves in the cultivation of humanity. The descent of kingship come from the gods of heaven themselves, but is carried in the hearts of men – passing on genetic memory in the form of ‘divine blood’ installing the system known as jure divino – the episcopal law upheld by one ‘anointed’ by God. . .

Mardukite Truth Seeker Press, 2011, Babylonian Myth & Magic (Liber 51) - The complete annotated edition by Joshua Free with foreword by Sortileges.