Mardukite Chamberlains | Seminary & Study Groups | Complete Overview

[nabu]

Chamberlains Seminary

When the materials composing the Mardukite Cycle were originally composed, the Mardukite Truth Seeker Press was not offering works to the general public and the work was seldom appearing in “anthologies.” There was no specific “learning” chronology intended, as the work was being released in conjunction with the timing that individual research and compilation projects were being completed. These projects each were meant to contribute to a grand archive of information – originally for internal purposes only – for the purpose of sustaining a modern “Mardukite” revival of the ancient Anunnaki source tradition that served as the basis for the later cultural and spiritual traditions to later emerge on the planet.



Necronomicon – The Anunnaki Bible

A seeker coming into the program now has to make decisions concerning the depth that they wish to pursue and the order in which to do it. The first four manifestos produced by the Council of Nabu-Tutu, edited by Joshua Free and released by the Mardukite Truth Seeker Press are now found compiled in a single volume, as they have been since early 2010, known as the Necronomicon – Anunnaki Bible. This work contains Liber N, Liber L, Liber G and Liber 9 – listed in the order in which they were released. They build upon the knowledge and resources of the others as stand alone volumes, but were edited together to make a better reference as the Necronomicon – Anunnaki Bible. The “Mardukite Chamberlains” (now enjoying its third active year of operations) find that this particular work is the most critical to possess for anyone seeking to not only understand the Mardukite work – the work is just as priceless as a general compendium of ancient lore otherwise unparalleled.

The emphasis of the work found in the libros of the Necronomicon – Anunnaki Bible is specifically what is considered “Mardukite” from an Egypto-Babylonian perspective. The works reviewed are the more famous and most influential to come from Nabu’s priest-scribes in ancient post-Sumerian Babylon, where the tablets were forged to show the Anunnaki deity Marduk as supreme. The systematic development of the “manifold gate-system” and the scriptural process of “magick” that humans and priests came to know thereafter were forged into tablets – serving as the basis for the methodologies to later evolve across the planet, separated by time and geography.

A Sumerian background however, which certainly undermines the integrity of the later Babylonian beliefs concerning the divinity of the Anunnaki and sought to conceal its Sumerian origins, is kept absent from the libros of the Necronomicon – Anunnaki Bible, which were reconstructed in the manner by which they were famously used by the “Mardukites” of Babylon (and even Egypt, where Marduk was known as “Ra”). The Babylonian Mardukite methodology is shown in self-honesty from its own perspective in the Necronomicon – Anunnaki Bible, being the tablets created by the Nabu-priests and scribes that served the line of Enki and Marduk in the southern half of Mesopotamia. Although the specifically Babylonian Mardukite tradition is neither the beginning or end of the story – it is the primary turning point between the Sumerian and post-Babylonian traditions, customs, cultural beliefs and spiritual worldviews. As such, to gain clarity to the hows and whys, the Seeker begins with this system – the archetype of all worldly systems – Babylon.



Liber 50 – The Secrets of Babylon

Once a seeker has been “initiated” into the “Great Mysteries” of the Babylonian temple of Nabu to Marduk, only then is there the chance for the revelation of another great mystery: the greatest kept secrets of Babylon – the ancient equivalent of an ancient global authoritarian conspiracy. This is not something that would have been granted to the common temple servant, or even the neophyte priest or scribe, who could spend many years copying or tending to tablets without knowing anything better of what they might represent. Even in ancient times, people performed religious lip-services or chose vocations simply out of convenience or necessity.

As in modern times, unsurprisingly, folks were also drawn to the inherent “magick” and “power” that might be wrought from the system – and so was enough for some to falsely pursue the mysteries outside of self-honesty. For this, among other reasons, the greatest kept secrets of Babylon (those concerning the supremacy of Marduk and the pre-Babylonian lineages of Enlil – as well as many other factors) were reserved for the “elite” of the secret service – those who could carry out the tradition reverently while keeping close guard on the truth that might undo the benefit of such endeavors. This “closed” Council of Nabu, led by Nabu, the prophet-scribe of Babylon and son of Marduk, thus maintained knowledge of these things separately from the remainder of the system – the one in which the people (and even the gods) had been brought into. The revelation of these particular mysteries form a sort of “companion” to the Necronomicon – Anunnaki Bible that the Mardukite Chamberlains have found equal to the value of its predecessor. This evolution of the understanding of the things that were and are is known as Liber 50, and is currently available in either of two formats: Gates of the Necronomicon or Sumerian Religion.

The Mardukite Chamberlains seem to unanimously agree that the combination of the Necronomicon Anunnaki Bible (Liber N, Liber L, Liber G, Liber 9) and Gates of the Necronomicon (or Sumerian Religion, Liber 50) exists a “core” or “foundation” of understanding for the “modern movement.” These five libros were later appended with two additional resources for seekers and adepts alike, as they climbed the (perceived to be, as a mystical pun, seven-fold) “Ladder of Lights” toward guardianship. While Liber 50 is considered the account for the happenings before Babylon – as well as that which of led to and conspired to be Babylon – the first of these later supplements (Liber D) is considered to account for the immediate “evolution” and perception of the Babylonian system as it came to be known after the fact.



Scions of the Anunnaki

Liber D is known among the Mardukite Chamberlains as Druids of the Necronomicon, the name that was originally intended for the first of the three parts collectively known elsewhere as the Book of Elven-Faerie by Joshua Free. [Liber D is currently only available in print under the title: Book of Elven-Faerie and limited offerings of a hardcover edition of Druids of the Necronomicon.] The premise of this work, originally written (and re-written) into several “beta-test versions” from 2006 through 2008 (released to the underground and on the original mardukite website), was to reveal the Mesopotamian origins of Druidism, and with it, the majority of what could be defined as the “western magickal tradition.” The emphasis here turns toward “practical magick” and “folk traditions” that appear to develop as if from nowhere throughout mainland Europe (and elsewhere). The traditions, as we can trace them, do indeed come from the Anunnaki sources in Mesopotamia. These later cultures and interpretations are merely separated by time and geography and the New Age movement, particularly in relation to its beliefs, customs and traditions, has not really given into the real self-honest truth of its sources.



Necronomicon Revelations – Aliens, Gods & Men

The final work, Liber R, was originally released as Necronomicon Revelations: Unveiling the Great Deception of Aliens, Gods & Men – though it later was re-edited along with most of Liber 9 as a new presentation of Nine Gates of the Kingdom of Shadows – by which it is currently available as. Having founded ourselves in Babylon, looked behind and then forward, we now play “catch-up” in Liber R, by focusing primarily on the last one-hundred years of human civilization concerning our previous focus, mainly: the Simonian Necronomicon, works of Zecharia Sitchin, H.P. Lovecraft’s Cthulhu Mythos, and the evolution of a modern Mardukite movement – all of which seems to be intentionally absent from the previous “stages” of learning; not necessarily due to any “difficulty rating” associated to the materials (being also the final and seventh volume in the Mardukite Necronomicon Cycle), but perhaps to keep the unnecessary distraction of modern interpretations away from the self-honest pursuit of the previous work. In many ways Liber R was also a “reward” for those who had reached a sense of “completion” in their existing studies in our program (released in August 2010).

* * * * * * *

Chronologically, the order in which the materials are generally learned is in imitation of the order in which they were originally released (as described above), as if the seeker had been working with the Mardukite Chamberlains since the beginning. This is the way it is intended for those who do follow with the work in this manner for coherency, particularly in study groups that are working together (and/or in collaboration with the Mardukite Chamberlains Home Office). Certainly, the works can each be read as stand-alone volumes, enjoyed and comprehended for what they contribute by themselves – so, don’t be alarmed if you have, perhaps, already acquired and read one “out of order” as such things are, as they say, “no big deal.” The methodology suggested, if worked through to its entirety, simply represents the most appropriately beneficial way of seeing the way in which “all of the pieces fit together.”

[Baylin]

From the perspective of someone who has only recently become familiar with this 'cycle' of work, and has been studying from the Necronomicon, Gates of the Necronomicon, and the Druids of the Necronomicon, I can offer my experience to this point as being extremely stimulating with regard to the revelations of the ancient, but also a little confusing if one does not understand from the start that this work does require a process that leads up to a final revelation, that gets around to explaining end expectations of the student once the cycle has been achieved.

In other words, it seems that the work is mainly explanation of how the ancient becomes the basis for the information provided, while at the same time providing a system for actually showing both, how this cycle was used and its original purposes, and how it can still be realized, as it is still valid today,

However I think personally that it is very helpful to any student to know from the beginning that, although a grasp of the historical and procedural aspects of this information is beneficial to fully understanding the cycle of work, it is not the goal of the the author to create a movement of historian scholars, (hope I am not putting words in his mouth), rather it is the goal of the movement to bring students to the realization of how all of this information and procedure can bring the human into the reality of the All that they are already a part of.

Without this final goal being realized, none of this cycle would have any meaning. All the magick and storing of information would be for naught. The student is therefore advised to be cautious about getting distracted from the goal by the passage,(bells and whistles), used to get that there.

This cycle of work brings us to an awareness and connection with the Source. Everything in between is just a path to get there.

[nabu]

Honestly, Baylin - am not sure what your missing to be honest. Either your trying to hard or still looking at it through human-colored glasses - I don't know.

[nabu]

Mardukite YouTube:
vlog version (part one) based on this posting at http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LqvU-kExxRU

[Baylin]

(10-25-2010 07:13 AM)nabu Wrote:  Honestly, Baylin - am not sure what your missing to be honest. Either your trying to hard or still looking at it through human-colored glasses - I don't know.

So I take that to mean that you would not agree with that description of the movement?

What is ti that I stated that would be inaccurate. That might help me to understand where you find me lacking in understanding of what you are trying to put forth with your work here.

I guess I need to ask, does it have to with the ritualistic aspect of opening the gates?

because I thought that you had said on a couple of occasions when I asked you about the lore and magick, that they were not as important as the actual ability of attaining self honesty.

---

I hope my questions are not being seen as criticism.

I do not know enough to make criticisms or judgments on this work. I am still trying to absorb as much as I can through my study.

But I am under the impression that this forum was a place where these questions could be asked and where the seeker could find assistance in reaching an understanding of the work. I don't expect to be personally tutored or anything, just thought that putting my questions and thoughts out here as I study might be helpful.

It seems that all it is accomplishing is frustration and annoyance,lol.

I understand the premise behind the movement. Sumeria and Babylon are the root of all that has become distorted. I get that.

I understand that there is a process of opening gates that was used by the ancients under the supervision and teaching of the Anunnaki that over time and geography became the occult of more modern times.

I understand that there was a deliberate effort to hide the final key for the reason of keeping that gate secure.

I understand that the main tenet behind the processes of gate opening has to do with attaining a state of self honesty.

I get all of this and it all makes sense and answers many of my questions.

What I want to know is, now that the Seeker has this information, is it practical to continue such practices as the rituals of opening gates, and training oneself in the process, OR is it your opinion that the practice of magick has been made unnecessary now that we understand the reason for it, and that all that is really required of the seeker is to reach a state of self honesty so they can connect with the All?

Maybe you are of the mind that this question is a step taken out of order, and that a question of this magnitude should be held back until one has studied further, where one would ultimately find the answer to that question. If so, that is logical reasoning. I don't have a problem, with that, And that is the reason I made the post above suggesting that new students bear in mind that learning all about magick is not as much a priority as the actual understanding of why magick was devised by the Anunnaki in the first place and achieving that state. Which is what I thought you had already told me in earlier posts when I asked about the importance of understanding Elven lore.

So please don't take my questions the wrong way or become agitated that I even ask them. I guess the best thing for me to do is to simply keep my thoughts to myself and seek the answers to any questions I have in the material. I will keep an eye out here for postings that can be helpful in my studies. meanwhile I will try to figure out exactly where I stand as a Mardukite Chamberlain and what is expected of me with regard to the cycle of work.

[nabu]

(10-25-2010 07:13 AM)nabu Wrote:  Mardukite YouTube:
vlog version (part one) based on this posting at http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LqvU-kExxRU

vlog version (part two) based on this posting at http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9vmUNNfqZtA

[nabu]

(10-25-2010 10:01 AM)Baylin Wrote:  So I take that to mean that you would not agree with that description of the movement?

My concern is not with what is said but with what isn't. Personally, I think if you would more casually read and re-read what you have before you and the work in hand, you will do fine. It is culmination of the posts being presented as one, in addition to correspondence I have received from others, concerning this, not only concern toward inherent dangers in the work (which are not existent) but also that there is some further hidden key that requires deciphering and fracturing that is not already right before you at this point. This isn't a question of intelligence, its a matter of the "ah-ha" "eureka" that I believe still waits for you when you find your keys on the table in front of you, or your glasses on top of your head - I think you're that close.

[Baylin]

(10-27-2010 01:16 PM)nabu Wrote:  

(10-25-2010 10:01 AM)Baylin Wrote:  So I take that to mean that you would not agree with that description of the movement?

My concern is not with what is said but with what isn't. Personally, I think if you would more casually read and re-read what you have before you and the work in hand, you will do fine. It is culmination of the posts being presented as one, in addition to correspondence I have received from others, concerning this, not only concern toward inherent dangers in the work (which are not existent) but also that there is some further hidden key that requires deciphering and fracturing that is not already right before you at this point. This isn't a question of intelligence, its a matter of the "ah-ha" "eureka" that I believe still waits for you when you find your keys on the table in front of you, or your glasses on top of your head - I think you're that close.

Yeah I just alluded to that in another thread, I was beginning to think it was something like that.

Still studying. Maybe my problem is that at this point I am trying to juggle a few balls at the same time. I am trying find corroboration from other sources to compare with this work, and studying those as well which is probably distracting me from what it is you are waiting for me to discover.

I will say, that I find that Nicholas DeVere and his teachings fall right into line with this work and I do recall you saying that you were a member of that court. That is why I have been asking what information on the Annunaki has been available in the past.

[nabu]

(10-27-2010 11:57 PM)Baylin Wrote:  Yeah I just alluded to that in another thread, I was beginning to think it was something like that.

Am trying to be clear and direct - not mean or put-off - I think you understand.

Quote:Still studying. Maybe my problem is that at this point I am trying to juggle a few balls at the same time. I am trying find corroboration from other sources to compare with this work, and studying those as well which is probably distracting me from what it is you are waiting for me to discover.

Is why I let folks run with whatever they want because you, deep inside, already know the whats what, it just comes down to you at this point.

Quote:I will say, that I find that Nicholas DeVere and his teachings fall right into line with this work and I do recall you saying that you were a member of that court.

Nick is a freaky guy but a good friend and I don't compete with the work he has already done, I work around and beyond it - for the work he has done is unparalleled as the work I have done is - and we like to think that we each contribute a major part of the modern movement. Nick's group is the only of the many many groups with claims to such that I recognize.

[nabu]

(10-27-2010 01:12 PM)nabu Wrote:  Mardukite YouTube:

vlog version (part one) based on this posting at http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LqvU-kExxRU

vlog version (part two) based on this posting at http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9vmUNNfqZtA

vlog version (part three) based on this posting at http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=51o7ABh1lWM